Why Twitter Continues to in Grow Importance

There are many who continue to question Twitter, its increasing importance to consumers and brands, or its overall monetization strategies. But, the data of user growth is staggering and brand participation and initial results from brand interaction more than promising. So many brands that we know and interact with like Microsoft, Alaska Air, Southwest, Wachovia, Dell, PCC Markets and others are doing a great job at building loyal followings, creating real-time communication platforms with customers, and the ability to target marketing specials. These interactions and the follower base are what is generating revenue and cost savings — creating more traction than fan pages of yesteryear did for many brands in places like FaceBook or MySpace.

So, this is why Twitter is and will continue to be valuable. In a recent article from Joe Marchese at SocialVibe he writes “Why Google Will Buy Twitter and Make Billions”. Google’s success has been its ability to “organize information on the Web (search results) and to monetize people’s intentions (marketing based on what people are searching for). Simply put, Google is a multibillion-dollar company because it can put marketers in front of people at the right time in the right way. Google has cornered the market on searching the Web for information, and monetizing that behavior.”

Twitter is the growing consumer interaction channel of choice and is now introducing search functionality that when honed and perfected as Joe says “will bring with it all the riches of search marketing…and will make Twitter worth billions — and why Google will (or at least should) buy Twitter.”  The power in Twitter conversations is that it will “help people find out where to find current discussions on a subject.”  Now what is that worth to marketers and advertisers?  Just as Google has been able to monetize around the traffic of search terms Twitter will be able to monetize around events, passions, concerns, etc. Joe writes “People are already fascinated by watching people discuss various events or topics live in real time, using Twitter search and # (hash tags). What these services do is to provide me with information (a stream of people’s thoughts) on any keyword, or series of keywords. Sound familiar.”

Well, if it worked for Google then it could and should work for Twitter.  “Google has proven that if you can provide a useful search experience, then you can provide useful marketing. If you can provide useful marketing, you can return amazing ROI for marketers. If you can provide amazing ROI for marketers, you can make a lot of money, say Joe.”

All these consumer and business conversations be it on Twitter, FaceBook, MySpace, and LinkedIn platforms are where brands and digital investment will continue to flow.  The need for marketers and organizations to understand this new landscape and to build and deploy the people, processes, and technologies to interact with these new channels is impertative.  See my post from a few weeks back with some ‘09 predictions and comments from a Forrester Report.

Nice article Joe.  I agree with you about the opportunity for Twitter or the next platform that may emerge.

Blake Cahill

Visible Technologies

Participate: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • blogmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • facebook
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

2 comments ↓

#1 Luis Antezana on 03.11.09 at 1:14 pm

If Twitter has such massive search and marketing potential, wouldn’t it make more sense for Microsoft to buy them as a grand step in its so far pathetic attempts to compete with Google in this space?

#2 Blake Cahill on 03.11.09 at 5:36 pm

Luis,

Good point. Microsoft could certainly play here as well. Would be interesting to see reaction from FaceBook since Twitter passed on investment from them.

Blake

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.